dataPATH FOR SUCCESS
 
Editor:  Melissa Vinson, CFCI   June 2002    Volume I, Issue 6

NUTS AND BOLTS


DataPath Sponsored Events

Other Events

Check out our Web Services!

Speed Up Technical Support!

Sales/Support:   Phone Numbers and Email Addresses


DataPath Sponsored Events

For more information on these events, go to our Event Calendar at
www.dpath.com/events/
eventcalendar.asp
.

July 18-19, 2002
105 Concept Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Education Seminar on Defined Contribution Approach Incorporating HRAs and Other Conduit 105 Arrangements

July 25-26, 2002
DPI-125 Basic Software Training Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Hands-on Training for Beginning Users of DPI-125

July 31-August 2, 2002
DPI-COBRA Education / Training Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Education on COBRA rules and regs and hands-on DPI-COBRA Training.

August 8-9, 2002
DPI-125 Version 2 Software Training Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Version 2 Hands-on Training for Experienced DPI-125 Users

September 5-6, 2002
105 Concept Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Education Seminar on Defined Contribution Approach Incorporating HRAs and Other Conduit 105 Arrangements

September 12-13, 2002
DPI-125 Basic Software Training Seminar
Little Rock, AR

Hands-on Training for Beginning Users of DPI-125

September 24-26, 2002
Annual DataPath Advanced Seminar
Memphis, TN

Subjects will include COBRA, Defined Contribution, DataPath's Plastic Solution, Internet Administration. John Hickman will be speaking one day on changes in regs. Come exchange ideas with other users over the country.

Go to top.

Other Events

For more information on these events, go to our Event Calendar at
www.dpath.com/events/
eventcalendar.asp
.

August 14-16, 2002
ECFC Cafeteria Plan Administrator's Symposium
Reno, NV

15th Annual Cafeteria Plan Administrator's Symposium will be held in Reno, NV. DataPath will have a booth.

Go to top.

Check out our Web Services!

Visit our web site at
www.dpath.com/
webservices/index.asp

to see the Web Services we are offering now or in the near future.

Go to top.

Health Care Issues

Each month, links to articles on general health care issues will be posted here.

USA Today, Wall Street Journal Examine Generic Medications.
www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_index.
cfm?DR_ID=11576

Federal Court Overturns Antibiotic Patent, Paves Way for Generic.
www.benefitnews.com/
health/detail.cfm?id=2988

President of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America discussed variety of prescription drug issues on C-Span.
www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_
index.cfm?DR_ID=11577

HMO Premiums Could Increase Up to 22% in 2003, Survey Indicates.
www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_
index.cfm?DR_ID=11548

CalPERS okays record HMO premiums.
www.benefitnews.com/
detail.cfm?id=2991

Agents, Brokers See Clients Trimming Medical Coverage.
www.benefitnews.com/
health/detail.cfm?id=2979

Survey Shows Employee Demand Keeps Dental a Hot Benefit.
www.benefitnews.com/
health/detail.cfm?id=2960

Wall Street Journal Examines Tiered Hospital Plans. www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_index.
cfm?DR_ID=11579

CA Blue Cross Tiered Plan Collapses under Pressure.
www.benefitnews.com/
health/detail.cfm?id=2987

HHS Report Provides Comprehensive Look at Women's Health, Illustrates Health Disparities.
www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_
index.cfm?DR_ID=11495

Wall Street Journal Examines Legislation that would Allow Reimportation of U.S.-Made Medications from Canada.
www.kaisernetwork.org/
daily_reports/rep_index.
cfm?DR_ID=11493

Go to top.

Speed Up Technical Support!

When anyone calls for Technical Support for our software, the support personnel need the information below.

If you have this information ready, it will save both you and the support personnel time.

Some of this information will not change, so it's a good idea to gather it now and keep it handy.

Name:
E-mail:
Company:
Phone:
Product:
System Area:

Error Number:
Error Message:
Error Code:
Error Filename:
Method Name:
Line Number:
Program:

Description of Problem:[Detailed information as to what the user was trying to do in the system when error occurred.]

Desktop Operating System in Use:  [For instance, Windows 98]

Office Version:  [For instance, Microsoft Office 97]

DataPath Product Version:  [In the software, look under Help/About . . .]

Go to top.

Sales and Support
Phone Numbers and Email Addresses

Telephone Numbers:
Sales:
1-800-633-3841

Tech Support:
1-501-296-9993

Regs Support:
1-501-296-9990 x212

Email Addresses:
Sales:
sales@dpath.com

Tech Support:
support@dpath.com

Regs Support:
regs@dpath.com

Go to top.


ARTICLES


       Government Issues Guidance on § 105 HRAs

       HRA in Review  by John Robbins, Sr.

       California Adopts Privacy Rules

       Automatic Enrollment for Cafeteria Plans Approved


Government Issues Guidance on § 105 HRAs

Look for follow-up commentaries in our monthly newsletters.

On June 26, 2002, the Treasury Department and the IRS released the guidance on Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs), arrangements in which the employee health benefit arrangement provides for employee-controlled reimbursement of medical costs.

"With this new guidance, we clear the way for employers to adopt health plans with patient-directed features so that employees have more choice and greater control over their health care coverage," stated Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill.

This guidance (a notice and a revenue ruling) provides that medical benefits paid by HRAs meeting certain requirements are not taxable, and generally are not subject to the design requirements for Health FSAs funded through a cafeteria plan.

The following links may be temporary. The published versions will not be available until July 15. At that time, we will notify you of the new links through our monthly newsletter.

Press Release PO-3204 (June 26, 2002)
www.ustreas.gov/press/releases/po3204.htm

Revenue Ruling 2002-41 (June 26, 2002)
www.ebia.com/misc/RR-2002-41.pdf

IRS Notice 2002-45 (June 26, 2002)
ww.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-02-45.pdf

Synopsis of Notice and Revenue Ruling

Rev. Rul. 2002- 41

Issue: Whether employer-provided coverage and medical care expense reimbursements made under a reimbursement arrangement that allows unused amounts to be carried forward, as described in Situations 1 and 2 below, are excludable from gross income under §§ 106 and 105 of the Internal Revenue Code, respectively.

Holding: Employer-provided coverage and medical care expense reimbursements made under the reimbursement arrangement that allows unused amounts to be carried forward, as described in Situations 1 and 2, are excludable from gross income under §§ 106 and 105, respectively.

Notice 2002-45

Purpose: This notice provides basic information about a type of employer-provided health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) described below.

Part I. Description of HRAs and their general tax treatment.
Part II. Benefits that may be offered under HRA.
Part III. Details of those who may be covered under HRA.
Part IV. Interaction between HRAs and § 125 cafeteria plans.
Part V. Ordering rules for reimbursement from HRAs and § 125 Health FSAs.
Part VI. Applicability of § 105(h) non-discrimination rules to HRAs.
Part VII. COBRA continuation coverage under HRAs.
Part VIII. Miscellaneous

Highlights

Those interested in 105 plans have been waiting for guidance from the IRS. Here is a list of our questions and the answers found in the new ruling.

How does IRS define HRAs?

An HRA is an arrangement that:

(1) is paid for solely by the employer and not provided pursuant to salary reduction election or otherwise under a § 125 cafeteria plan;

(2) reimburses the employee for medical care expenses (as defined by § 213(d) of the Internal Revenue Code) incurred by the employee and the employee’s spouse and dependents (as defined in § 152); and

(3) provides reimbursements up to a maximum dollar amount for a coverage period and any unused portion of the maximum dollar amount at the end of a coverage period is carried forward to increase the maximum reimbursement amount in subsequent coverage periods.

To the extent that an HRA is an employer-provided accident or health plan, coverage and reimbursements of medical care expenses of an employee and the employee's spouse and dependents are generally excludable from the employee's gross income under §§ 106 and 105.

Assuming that the maximum amount of reimbursement which is reasonably available to a participant under an HRA is not substantially in excess of the value of coverage under the HRA, an HRA is a flexible spending arrangement (FSA) as defined in § 106(c)(2).

An arrangement is not treated as an HRA if the arrangement interacts with a cafeteria plan in such a way as to permit employees to use salary reduction indirectly to fund the HRA.

Can funds be carried over into future years?

Yes, any unused portion of the maximum dollar amount at the end of a coverage period can be carried forward to increase the maximum reimbursement amount in subsequent coverage periods.

What benefits can be offered under an HRA?

To qualify for §§ 106 and 105 exclusions, an HRA may only provide benefits that reimburse expenses for medical care as defined by § 213(d), which are incurred by the employee and the employee’s spouse and dependents (as defined in § 152). This includes amounts paid for premiums for accident or health coverage for current employees, retirees, and COBRA qualified beneficiaries. (Be cautious when allowing reimbursement of health premiums in an HRA. Violations may arise from HIPAA issues and indirect salary reduction funding of the HRA. Also, you need to make sure it complements your plan design.)

If any person has the right to receive cash or any other taxable or non-taxable benefit under the arrangement other than the reimbursement of medical care expenses, all distributions to employees for the current year become taxable.

Who is covered under an HRA?

Medical care expense reimbursements under an HRA are excludable under § 105(b) to the extent the reimbursements are provided to the following individuals: current and former employees (including retired employees), their spouses and dependents (as defined in § 152 as modified by the last sentence of § 105(b)), and the spouses and dependents of deceased employees. The term "employee" does not include a self-employed individual as defined in § 401(c).

Do the rules for Health FSAs apply to HRAs?

The proposed regulations relating to health FSAs under § 125 state that certain requirements apply whether or not the health FSA is part of a cafeteria plan. Future guidance will modify the proposed regulation under § 125 to clarify that while those rules continue to apply to health FSAs provided pursuant to salary reduction election under a § 125 cafeteria plan, they do not apply to HRAs.

Because an HRA is paid for solely by the employer and not pursuant to salary reduction, the following restrictions on health FSAs under § 125 are not applicable to HRAs:

(1) the prohibition against a benefit that defers compensation by permitting employees to carry over unused elective contributions or plan benefits from one plan year to another plan year (No use-it-or-lose-it rule.);

(2) the requirement that the maximum amount of reimbursement must be available at all times during the coverage period (No uniform coverage rule.);

(3) the mandatory twelve-month period of coverage ; and

(4) except as otherwise provided in this notice, the limitation that medical expenses reimbursed must be incurred during the period of coverage. (Expenses may be reimbursed in previous periods if employee was covered then.)

As a result, the maximum reimbursement amount for a coverage period (not including amounts carried forward from previous coverage periods) need not be available at all times during the coverage period.

Also, an HRA may specify a coverage period for a reimbursement amount that is less than twelve months.

Although claims incurred during one coverage period may be reimbursed in a later coverage period, an unreimbursed claim may be reimbursed in a later coverage period only if the individual was covered under the HRA when the claim was incurred.

Additionally, the maximum reimbursement amount credited under the HRA in the future (not including amounts carried forward from previous coverage periods) may be increased or decreased. However, if an increase in maximum reimbursement amounts in an HRA favors one or more highly compensated individuals, the HRA may violate these non-discrimination rules.

Must the medical expenses be paid by the HRA before being eligible for reimbursement through the FSA?

According to the current § 125 rules, medical expenses may not be reimbursed from a § 125 Health FSA if the expense has been reimbursed or is reimbursable under any other accident or health plan. If you apply this rule and coverage is provided under both an HRA and a § 125 health FSA, the amounts available under an HRA must be exhausted before reimbursements may be made from the FSA.

However, the HRA Plan Document can specify that expenses cannot be reimbursed under the HRA until the FSA funds are exhausted. This way the funds are not "reimbursable" from the HRA.

Does COBRA apply?

An HRA is a group health plan generally subject to the COBRA continuation coverage requirements. If an individual elects COBRA continuation coverage, an HRA complies with these COBRA requirements by providing for the continuation of the maximum reimbursement amount for an individual at the time of the COBRA qualifying event and by increasing that maximum amount at the same time and by the same increment that it is increased for similarly situated non-COBRA beneficiaries (and by decreasing it for claims reimbursed). Premiums are determined under the existing rules in § 4980B.

In Rev. Rul. 2002-41, Situation 1, a qualified beneficiary who chooses to elect COBRA continuation coverage may only elect the HRA in conjunction with the major medical plan. However, a qualified beneficiary may choose to elect COBRA continuation coverage for only the major medical plan.

What about non-discrimination rules?

Section 105(h) sets forth nondiscrimination rules for self-insured medical expense reimbursement plans. To the extent an HRA is a self-insured medical expense reimbursement plan, the nondiscrimination rules under § 105(h) apply to the HRA. However, no guidance was provided on how to apply this to an HRA.

§ 1.105-11(c)(3)(ii) regarding operational discrimination in favor of highly compensated individuals (as defined in § 105(h)) also applies. For instance, If an increase in maximum reimbursement amounts in an HRA favors one or more highly compensated individuals, the HRA may violate these non-discrimination rules

What happens when employees with a balance in the HRA terminate employment or retire?

An HRA may continue to reimburse former employees or retired employees for medical care expenses after termination of employment or retirement (even if the employee does not elect COBRA continuation coverage). The plan may also provide that the maximum reimbursement amount available after retirement or other termination of employment is reduced for any administrative costs of continuing such coverage. Additionally, an HRA may or may not provide for an increase in the amount available for reimbursement of medical care expenses after the employee retires or otherwise terminates employment (even if the employee does not elect COBRA continuation coverage)

Go to top.

HRA in Review
by John Robbins, Sr.

The release of the above guidance for Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs) allows the benefits delivery community to begin building their strategies with confidence.

An HRA can be offered as a stand-alone plan without reference to any other health benefit, or it can be offered as a significant component within a defined contribution approach to health care.

Other components can include:

  • High-Deductible Health Coverage (HDHC): Insurance policy or partially self-funded plan
  • Wrap plan or conduit plan bridging the HDHC to the HRA
  • Internet tools for universal access to unique Plan, Participant, and Benefit data for each individual plus access to health information databases, on-line nurses, and Board Certified Physicians.

(Note: Another school of thought concerning health care delivery systems is known as Consumer-driven Health Plans which places more emphasis on employee or individual empowerment while the DC Approach begins with the Employer's budget constraints. For purposes of this discussion, I will treat both equally under the term "DC Approach".)

The objective of this article is to open dialog on the more salient issues concerning the recently released IRS Ruling 2002-41 and how this guidance will most likely impact DataPath’s 105 delivery systems.

DataPath has been in this marketplace since 1995 when it introduced Max105, which empowers the Employer with the ability "to buy down premium by assuming some of the risk". This, in turn, provides the Employer with plan design options, budgetary control, and increased autonomy from the carrier.

By saving premiums (sometimes in excess of 25 to 40% annually), employers have been able to continue to offer their employees health insurance, even at below-market rates.

This type of arrangement underscores one of the basic principals underlying the more recent vintages of 105 plans: Buy less insurance and spend less premium dollars.

The newer 105 plans, especially since Rev Rule 2002-41, encourage employers to take the premium savings dollars (difference between the cost of the current first-dollar health policy and the cost of the HDHC) and allocate them to employee-controlled HRAs. The idea is that employees will become more cost conscious when spending their money.

Before this approach could be accepted on a widespread basis, the IRS needed to provide guidance (Rev. Rule 2002-41 June 26, 2002) on the concept of "carry-over" of the unused balance from one year to the next.

DataPath’s new 105 system, HRA-105, is designed to administer HRAs. (You have previously heard it called MERP-105. The MERP stood for Medical Expense Reimbursement Plan, but since Rev. Rul. 2002-41, the plan design of choice will be HRA,, we have changed the name of our system to reflect the name of the account that it designed to manage.)

DataPath HRA-105 is designed to stand-alone or be a component to a Defined Contribution Plan consisting of the HRA | Bridge | Insurance Policy. The HRA-105 will manage expenses to be paid out of the employee's Employer Funded HRA and future rollover amounts.

A typical HRA-105 Plan uses the linked approach as the design strategy. Under this strategy, the employee is required to have the High-Deductible Health Coverage (HDHC) in order to be eligible for the HRA.

The payout is typically limited to items covered by the HDHC except for the Bridge or the amount of coverage the employee is responsible for before the insurance coverage starts paying.

Through plan design, these types of plans will most likely not cover other 213(d) expense items since most FSA-type systems cannot support multiple benefit designs under one single account.

The good news is that Datapath's HRA-105 system supports multiple benefit designs under a SINGLE HRA plan. This gives the user the ability to design a plan according to the employer's objectives.

For example, under a single annual $2,000 HRA, the benefit options could be designed such that the employee could place $500 dollars under a dental option and the remaining $1,500 under the HDHC Deductible option. The system will coordinate the utilization between the benefit options all within the Single $2,000 HRA account.

The Bridge coverage between the HRA and the HDHC is the employee's responsibility. For instance, the HRA is $1,000 for single and $2,000 for family, and the HDHC deductible is $2,000 single and $4,000 family. This would leave Bridge amounts of $1,000 and $2,000 respectively. This is great until the practitioner wants to create steerage between various plan options.

To be continued in next newsletter

Go to top.

California Adopts Privacy Rules

California's legislature recently adopted Cal. Civil Code § 3798.85 (2001) which places restrictions on the use of social security numbers and requires secure web connections in certain situations. These provisions are generally effective after July 1, 2002. It is expected that other states may adopt similar regulations.

Here are the pertinent restrictions placed on the social security number and the regulation to use a secure web connection. Under these regs, an entity is not allowed to:

  1. Publicly post or publicly display in any manner an individual’s social security number.
  2. Print an individual’s social security number on any card required for a person to access products or services;
  3. Require an individual to transmit his or her social security number over the Internet unless the connection is secure or the social security number is encrypted.
  4. Require an individual to use his or her social security number to access an Internet Web site, unless a password or unique personal identification number or other authentication device is also required to access the Web site.
  5. Print an individual's social security number on any materials that are mailed to the individual, unless state or federal law requires the social security number to be on the document to be mailed. Notwithstanding this provision, applications and forms sent by mail may include social security numbers.
Secure Web Site

This regulation would only apply to our I-Flex users. Our users need to arrange with their web hosts to have a secure web connection. DataPath cannot provide this.

Social Security Number

DataPath is working on a solution for the Social Security Number problem, and will release it as soon as possible. We are handling it by allowing employee numbers to be assigned to the employees.

On the Employee Screen, users will have the option of assigning an employee number to each employee instead of the Social Security Number. Then, the user will mark (according to directions we will provide) each employer who needs to use employee numbers.

Once an employer is marked, any reports printed will have the employee number substituted for the social security number.

We will send out notices as soon as the solution is ready to be downloaded.

To see the California bill, you can go to http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/bill/sen/sb_0151-0200/sb_168_bill_20011011_chaptered.pdf.

Go to top.

Automatic Enrollment for Cafeteria Plans Approved

Under Rev. Rul. 2002-27 (May 20, 2002),

  1. Cafeteria plans may use an automatic enrollment process whereby the employee's salary is reduced each year to pay for a portion of the group health coverage under the plan unless the employee affirmatively elects cash.
  2. Employers may treat all participants as being in the cafeteria plan for section 4l5 purposes even though the plan mandates salary reduction and coverage for uninsured participants

To view the ruling, go to www.unclefed.com/Tax-Bulls/2002/rr02-27.pdf.

Go to top

LEGAL DISCLAIMER: Material contained in this newsletter is not legal advice, and should not be construed as legal advice. If you need legal advice upon which you can rely, you must seek a legal opinion from your attorney.

If you know someone who would like to receive our newsletter, email subscribe-path@dpath.com. with their name, company name, telephone number, and email address and they will be added to the mailing list.

If you want to unsubscribe, send a blank email to unsubscribe-path@dpath.com.

© DataPath, Inc.